Single engagement
A scoped review with a clear start and end. We look at a specific area, map what we find, and give you a plain-language picture of what to address and in what order.
System 360
Most gaps in security posture, compliance readiness, and development process are visible from the outside long before they surface internally. System 360 is how you find them first.
How your current controls hold up against what you are actually running.
Where you stand before auditors look. What needs to be in place and in what order.
Where security posture breaks down in practice. Development, deployment, and the applications they produce.
Not a tool. An advisor who has been in the room.
Josh Fischer leads every engagement. He has worked directly alongside executive teams at Amazon, Mastercard, Ring, Bayer, and Monsanto. That experience shapes what he looks for and how findings get communicated to the people who have to act on them.
Complex environments accumulate gaps over time. System 360 brings an outside perspective to find them before they become a problem. Where the scope calls for it, Josh brings others in under his direction.
A scoped review with a clear start and end. We look at a specific area, map what we find, and give you a plain-language picture of what to address and in what order.
Josh stays alongside your team as the work evolves. Available when questions come up, when the environment changes, or when something new lands on the calendar.
Where gaps typically live.
Security gaps rarely announce themselves. They accumulate in the space between what the policy says and how the work actually gets done.
How your current controls hold up against what you are actually running. Not a checkbox exercise. A realistic picture of where you are exposed and what the priority order is to address it.
Where you stand against the frameworks that matter to your business and your auditors. What needs to be in place before the window opens, and what needs to change to stay there.
Where security posture breaks down in practice is rarely in policy. It is in how teams actually build and deploy. We look at the real workflows, not the documented ones.
A structured review of your applications for exposure points that teams close to the work often miss. Pattern recognition from seeing the same gaps surface across many different environments.
What to expect
Both engagement types follow the same process. The scope and duration differ. The approach does not.
1. Discovery
We start by understanding what you are running, what you are worried about, and what is on the calendar. Executive and team conversations, value stream and risk mapping, baseline posture review.
2. Findings
A current-state picture of what works, where the gaps are, and the wins that matter most. Prioritized. Plain language. Not a 200-page report that sits in a drawer.
3. Adjust
We adjust based on what we have learned and what is actually important to your team. Options with tradeoffs, a target state, and a plan that reflects your priorities rather than a generic template.
4. Implement
Short cycles that ship real changes. Runbooks, policy updates, configurations, and handoff notes that leave your team in a stronger position than we found them.
System 360 ends with a clear picture, not a long report. Leadership gets something they can act on. Engineering gets a plan that reflects the actual work.
Time to first plan
2 to 4 weeks
Clouds
AWS, Azure, GCP
Engagement models
Single or ongoing
Whether you have a specific gap you need mapped or you are not sure where to start, that is exactly what the first call is for.